Matriarchy Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I was tempted to ignore a recent essay by the U.S. Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy, about the need for warning labels on social media platforms, but yesterday my 8-year-old spent part of the afternoon alone in her room making videos of herself pretending to sell products to an imaginary audience on YouTube, and I thought, “No, this one’s for me too.”
Murthy calls for a Surgeon General’s warning label, along the lines of the warnings on tobacco products, alerting users to the significant harm to young people’s mental health that’s been associated with social media use.
We may not have all the information about the exact harms of social media platforms, but we have enough information to act.
“In an emergency,” Murthy writes, “You don’t have the luxury to wait for perfect information. You assess the available facts, you use your best judgment, and you act quickly.”
“Adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of anxiety and depression symptoms,” Murthy writes. “The average daily use in this age group, as of the summer of 2023, was 4.8 hours.”
Paid subscriptions and gift subscriptions keep this work going, starting at just $5 a month using the link below, and give you unlimited to access to MR posts, archives, and subscriber chats.
Thank you for reading, and thank you for being here!
A survey by the Digital Wellness Lab, run by Boston Children’s Hospital, found that nearly half of adolescents say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies.
Do warning labels make a difference?
Murthy says yes: A study of Latino parents (Latino kids are more likely to use social platforms than non-Latino kids) found that 76% would be more likely to monitor their kids' social media usage if it came with a Surgeon General’s warning label.
Of course, warning labels are not enough. There is plenty of direct action that Murthy has called for, including legislation that would protect kids from online harassment and exploitation, and keep sexual content and extreme violence out of kids’ social feeds.
We should also have laws that prevent companies from collecting sensitive data from kids and restrict their use of features like autoplay and infinite scroll, which, Murthy writes, “prey on developing brains and contribute to excessive use.”
It’s complicated. Parents who need a break can hand their kids a phone or a tablet – the devices give you back your sleep, time to work, cook, clean, and have conversations with other adults.
But parents also know these platforms, in many ways, make their lives harder.
A 2020 study conducted by the Pew Research Center found that 66% of parents think that parenting is harder now than it was 20 years ago, and they cite navigating social media technology as among the biggest reasons.
(And this study was conducted before COVID-19 lockdowns shut us and our children into our homes).
It’s pretty clear that, as with so many other issues, parents are being asked to come up with individual solutions to what are really systemic problems.
Remember, Murthy writes, you’re one parent “pitted against some of the best product engineers and most well-resourced companies in the world.”
Would you help us out by throwing us a like and a comment? That helps us find new readers. You can also send MR to someone who would like it!
We've written before about the mental health benefits of keeping our kids off phones for as long as possible. But that’s only effective up to a point.
Some parents are organizing. The group Mothers Against Media Addiction has laid out clear recommendations for how to keep your kids off phones, and how to advocate for state-level legislation to protect kids.
Murthy recommends the youth-led group LogOff Movement, and Wired Human, which fights digital exploitation.
In May, parents of the fourth graders in Uvalde, Texas filed a lawsuit against the video game “Call of Duty,” the gun manufacturer Daniel Defense and Instagram, for their part in the shooting.
The 18-year-old who killed the children and teachers spent significant time playing “Call of Duty,” which allows video game players to play with simulations of real guns – including one made by Daniel Defense – making the game “the most prolific and effective marketer of assault weapons in the United States,” according to the lawsuit.
Plus, the lawsuit argues, “Instagram allowed Daniel Defense to promote its products through its social media presence even though the platform formally bans firearms advertising.
“Refuse to be a victim,” one of the gun company’s Instagram posts read, with an image of a person taking an assault-style rifle out of the trunk of a car.”
(I recommend this interview about the lawyer behind the lawsuit, who got involved with suing gun companies after talking to a cab driver whose friend’s child was killed in the shooting at Sandy Hook, Connecticut.)
There’s so much to be overwhelmed by – no doubt.
But who benefits by not taking action? The tech companies that profit from children’s eyeballs, their data and their time.
Murthy’s essay points to clear solutions, and reminds us that other crises have been solved. Car deaths dropped because we forced car companies to install airbags and seat belts and do crash testing. Tobacco products come with warnings and smoking has been banned throughout the country. Foods that cause disease outbreaks can get recalled within days.
The harms caused by social media use “are not a failure of willpower and parenting,” Murthy writes.
“They are the consequence of unleashing powerful technology without adequate safety measures, transparency or accountability.”
These are solvable problems. Let’s get to it.
Some readers have told us they want to comment on our posts, but reading these posts on your phone make it hard to figure out how. One way to make this easier it to read MR on the Substack App. You’ll be able comment, share, and find other newsletters that cover topics you care about.
Thank you so much for this article!
If I can’t control my media use, what chance does my 8 year old have?
I think this is a crisis that we adults are all overlooking because we’re so addicted to the same tech.
I was raised in the “just say no” era by two parents who were daily cannabis users. Suffice it to say that Nancy Reagan didn’t have much of an impact when I saw my parents getting high every night.
Media addiction is easy to overlook because it’s so socially acceptable and the addictive chemicals are in our brains; not supplied by a substance.
I hope MAMA is going to make a huge difference; as well as great articles like this one.
Thanks for featuring our terrific Surgeon General, Vivek Murphy, and his new campaign to put warnings on social media. It is a start and, just like warnings on tobacco and seat belts, it makes a difference. We have to be aware there was a lot of corporate fightback and misinformation before those warnings were adopted. Hopefully, these will be adopted faster since there seems to be some bipartisan support for them
Great piece.