47 Comments

After I spent two weeks excavating with a Mormon co-worker (I used to be an archaeologist, we were digging together every day for 10 hours), where we compared notes on her upbringing as a Mormon and mine as a Catholic, I concluded that Mormonism is a lot like Catholicism, which really pissed my mom off when I mentioned it to her, but is undeniable if you actually know anything about both of them. It's all a matter of degree.

And this part:

"There is no part of your life, no thought you can form, that’s not filtered through your Mormon-wired brain."

hits hard, because I left the Catholic Church 20 years ago and I would not say that I am 100% not-Catholic yet. There's a reason people joke about being a recovering Catholic. I feel fine showing my shoulders because I wasn't raised in an extremely conservative church, but I still feel weird about cleavage because I wasn't raised in an extremely liberal church.

Expand full comment

Thanks for sharing this, Colby. Years ago Mormons were also raised that Catholics were the "bad guys" haha ! I like the phrase "recovering" Catholic, Mormons definitely need to borrow this term :)

Expand full comment

There was a time when I hated that term, and refused to use it, and actually said things like, "I'm not recovering! I'm recovered. I'm not Catholic anymore, I'm done." When I'd only stopped going to Mass two years prior. Oh, sweet summer child.

Expand full comment

Love it that the first comment I read says exactly what I was thinking. This last line clued me in: "Of course, there’s also many other things in the show that are very Mormon that are darker—family estrangement, shunning, eating disorders, domestic abuse and controlling relationships." This is what Catholicism did to my family. My mother stayed married to an emotionally and sexually abusive man (my father), and hasn't spoken to me in years because I "destroyed the family." Meanwhile my brother has rampant affairs, sexual misconduct, and when his marriage falls apart and his ex-wife starts dating, he sues her for full custody (as in complete custody, no access for her) and has drug her through the court system with his wealth and insanity until she's been financially eviscerated. Which was his stated intent. And I "destroyed my family" by standing with my former sister-in-law. Sorry, that was a lot. But the point is that restrictive religious systems destroy women and children, and you can definitely put Catholicism in that category.

Expand full comment

Ha! Same wavelength- I could not stop myself from both bingeing and writing about this show! Also I started my essay with “I usually don’t watch reality tv.” You and me? We’re not like the other Mormon girls 🫠

Also the connection of Mormonism to Latin ballroom dance is another one of those interesting paradoxes. All of my husband’s family did ballroom super competitively. The girls are as moral and chaste and squeaky clean as they come… until they are competing the rumba 💃🏻🔥

Expand full comment

This is maybe definitely both of our thing 😅

I can’t wait to read yours! I had fun writing this honestly it reminded me how fun Mormon culture can be. Sometimes :)

Expand full comment

OMG this made my day: "Is Taylor Paul our polygamist-wife ancestors’ dream? Hard to say, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility." Bahahahaha! Isn't this the truth!

Expand full comment

Ha!! Thank you Sarah I loved writing this part 😅 IYKYK!

I haven’t watched enough to see how toxic her relationship is. But in terms of living her best life including sex life while low key highlighting the hypocrisy of the Mormon church…I love it.

Would be interested in your thoughts in the sex “scandal” part of this!

Expand full comment

Haha, I can totally see why! This is pure gold!

I haven’t had a chance to watch this yet, so will have to buckle up and get ready for a ride. I remember when this scandal went down during covid, with the soaking and “it’s okay to put it in, but not to thrust” (wtf?!).

Curious how much they actually get into this? We’ll just have to see!

I’ll return and report. 😂

Expand full comment

Hahaha! Pls do! You’re THE perfect person to analyze soft swinging for us!

Expand full comment

They put Sam Smith's Unholy at the end of the trailer, what exactly are they saying is 'soft' swinging again🫣😂. I had to go and look it up after reading this but it seems the trailer is the only thing we're getting for now outside of the US. It's so fascinating that using make-up and doing things to be seen as pretty are seen as good things by these strict religions, or at least allowed.

Expand full comment

Ha! Bad news about the swinging—there’s no tell all about the dang swinging! Total bait and switch! 4 eps in no details.

Where’s the swinging deets?? 😂😂

Expand full comment

Haha! We could have seen that coming to be fair 🤣.

Expand full comment

I am also ex-Mormon and totally experience the “world collapse” as I left the church. I find this show endlessly fascinating. Thank you for this article!

Expand full comment

The “world collapse” is so validating and I hope it’s helpful to you ❤️

Expand full comment

As someone who decided religion wasn’t for me early in age, this still hits spot on with a sledgehammer. I say good on ya ladies. Make them uncomfortable…paybacks for the years of repression you’ve suffered.

Expand full comment

Right?!! It’s easy to feel for them in all their flaws.

Expand full comment

"Is Taylor Frankie Paul the revenge fantasy of our polygamist-wife ancestors?" I just watched the first episode of TSLOMW (for the same reasons you did, because when there is saucy Mormon content I run, not walk as a born-and-raised Utahn, no matter what the context is). Our sister-wife ancestors put up with so much ridiculousness; I love thinking about the show in this karmic light.

Expand full comment

Ha! Right?! I think of them often. I hope this show has them cackling in their graves thx for reading!

Expand full comment

Enjoyed this article almost as much as the show😆 such a solid and fun analysis.

Expand full comment

Thanks so much! And thanks for reading :)

Expand full comment

You nailed it! Fun read. 😉

Expand full comment

Thanks so much!

Expand full comment

Loved this, Lane. I've been so fascinated by all the various smart analyses (like Sara Petersen's) parsing out the question of where patriarchy is and isn't being subverted here, and thought that your ability to situate it more broadly in LDS culture really unlocked so much for me. Thank you!

No need to respond to this half, but if you did have a take here there's a question that I've been wrestling with in the past few weeks that I anticipate you'd have a smart take on. [Caveat here that my LDS knowledge is secondary; the part of the West I grew up in is significantly less LDS and while my wife was raised in a heavily LDS area of SE Idaho, her family weren't part of the church]. My limited understanding of LDS history is that from the beginning the church was many things (high control, hierarchical, white supremacist, immensely patriarchal, but also utopian proto-socialist) and it's notable that over time all the parts that one might hope the church would evolve on (the high control/patriarchy/white supremacy, etc.) have either remained unchanged or evolved from explicit to implicit for greater public acceptance but the one thing that the church abandoned altogether was what I'd argue was its best feature (though a sympathetic argument could be made that the church is an extra-statist social democracy for its members). I guess I have two questions-- one, is that analysis/read of history correct or incorrect? And, if it is mildly correct, would you foresee that in the next decades there may be some outward moves towards softening (at least from a PR perspective) the church's patriarchy ("soft patriarchy," lol)-- such as being slightly less restrictive on things like clothing that reveals the wearer isn't wearing garments, a little more open to women working non home-based jobs, etc. as long as that 'softening' doesn't impact the broader structure and/or bottom line of the church?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 23
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Oops on the unclear sentence-- by "best feature" (defined by somebody with my particular political biases) I was referring to what some scholars would argue was the early church's utopian proto-socialism.https://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/when_mormons_were_socialists/

Also: such fascinating context re: Smith vs. Young on race (at least Black/White race relations-- that makes me curious on whether there's been any scholarship on whether Smith would have taken a different stance re: Mormon/Indigenous relations had he led the church post-Nauvoo), but regardless, no pressure but excited for your thoughts on the other questions too...

Expand full comment

I’m just a fly on the wall of this back-and-forth. SO INTERESTING YOU TWO!

Expand full comment

Ha! You get an award for reading all this, Danielle! 😅

Expand full comment

Utah native here, born and raised (and still here). So let’s say I have a vested interest.

Expand full comment

Ha! You should be informing US!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 24
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

That's so helpful, thank you! I think it's going to be interesting to watch from both directions-- both the question of where a patriarchal, high control institution chooses to strategically allow small amounts of reform/subversion AND what areas members who remain connected to that institution (and who were, like you noted for yourself, raised in a pure prosperity gospel world of Mormonism) subvert on a grassroots level and what areas they don't? [By which I mean-- I love that there might be tiny signs of internal member-driven subversion of church doctrine on sexuality and gender issues, but it's notable that it's being done in a paradigm that still exalts wealth/capitalism and Whiteness, at least at this point)? Regardless, so many fascinating layers here and I appreciate your patience and diligence as an Ex-mo feminist scholar with my complete outsider curiosity!

Expand full comment

"there might be tiny signs of internal member-driven subversion of church doctrine on sexuality and gender issues, but it's notable that it's being done in a paradigm that still exalts wealth/capitalism and Whiteness, at least at this point)." I think that's about right! Add patriarchy in there, and that's about it.

I'm not a scholar of this, but thank you for the kind words! There are a lot of things that I love about Mormon culture and it's fun to talk about and think about :)

Expand full comment

As an east coast born and raised LDS women, some of the culture you are describing above is Utah Mormon culture, and not representative of Mormon culture across the country. The few times I have visited or lived in Utah I never felt comfortable, the church was so all encompassing and suffocating there, but I don’t feel that living in places with fewer LDS people.

Expand full comment

I have lived outside of Utah for most of my adult life and it’s a different aesthetic and vibe on the east coast for sure. But the doctrine remains the same!

Expand full comment

THANK YOU for this!

Expand full comment

Thank you for reading, Sara!

Expand full comment

Lane I loved this

Expand full comment

Emma! Thanks so much my friend :)

Expand full comment

I did not know about the world collapse thing! Now, I can make sense of some more stuff.

And I just might want to go watch this show out of sheer curiosity…

Expand full comment

Right?! It’s so validating! And I’m not recommending the show but I’m not NOT recommending it… :)

Expand full comment

Yes it really is, thank you for helping with that! Oh, I’m just curious as to what I left behind and what’s changed and not… ; )

Expand full comment

WORLD COLLAPSE!!!! I experienced this as I became exvangelical!!!!!

Expand full comment

I bet!! It is a real thing! If you follow the link the description in the research is very validating :)

Expand full comment

Oh I already did and scheduled a therapy appt!

Expand full comment

Fantastic! 🙌

Expand full comment

Thanks for sharing.

Expand full comment